Search for: "Myers v. State of Arkansas" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 9:27 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit More Blog Entries: Florida Lawmakers Propose Tougher Texting-While-Driving Law, Dec. 26, 2015, Fort Myers Injury Attorney Blog The post Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
Regarding Starnet's claim for reimbursement the court said there was no statutory mechanism to make this happen (remember that workers' compensation is a wholly statutory scheme).In another case, Myers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 am by Susan Brenner
Since federal courts were created to adjudicate issues under federal law, you may wonder how this federal court can hear Arkansas state law claims, as well as the three federal causes of action. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2008) (applying “substantially certain” standard of Restatement §8A).ArkansasArkansas has a punitive damages statute requiring that the defendant ‘knew or ought to have known . [read post]